Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
170 F.2d 146
This text of 170 F.2d 146 (Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., 170 F.2d 146 (3d Cir. 1948).
Opinion
Our examination of the record in this case satisfies us that the district court rightly dismissed the complaint upon the ground, set up as the third defense in the defendant’s answer, that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly the judgment of the district court, 75 F.Supp. 732, will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
75 F. Supp. 732 (D. Delaware, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 F.2d 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-rohm-haas-co-ca3-1948.