Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
170 F.2d 146
Opinion
Our examination of the record in this case satisfies us that the district court rightly dismissed the complaint upon the ground, set up as the third defense in the defendant’s answer, that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly the judgment of the district court, 75 F.Supp. 732, will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., 170 F.2d 146 (3d Cir. 1948).
170 F.2d 146 (Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
75 F. Supp. 732 (D. Delaware, 1948)