Carpenter v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 102, 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 90, 2002 WL 233460
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
DecidedFebruary 15, 2002
Docket99-0794
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Vet. App. 102 (Carpenter v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 102, 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 90, 2002 WL 233460 (Cal. 2002).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On June 21, 2001, the full Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the April 6, 1999, Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision which found that the total fees charged by the appellant, Kenneth M. Carpenter, for his representation of veteran, Victor S. Weatherspoon, were excessive and unreasonable. On October 18, 2001, the Secretary filed a motion for reconsideration. The appellant filed a response, urging the Court to reconsider the matter for different reasons. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Secretary’s motion for reconsideration is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpenter v. Principi
15 Vet. App. 64 (Veterans Claims, 2001)
Garlejo v. Brown
10 Vet. App. 229 (Veterans Claims, 1997)
Marsh v. West
11 Vet. App. 468 (Veterans Claims, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Vet. App. 102, 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 90, 2002 WL 233460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-principi-cavc-2002.