Carpenter v. Payne

10 Wend. 604
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Wend. 604 (Carpenter v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Payne, 10 Wend. 604 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

This is a mere clerical error, and the plaintiff is entitled to amend ; but the defendant swearing to a defence, and that, relying upon the variance, he omitted to prepare for trial, we cannot permit the verdict to stand. The defendant ought not to have availed himself of the technical error in the declaration, but should have put forward his defence; still, strictly he might take the course which he has adopted, and all we can do is to relieve the plaintiff without subjecting him to costs. Let a rule be entered that the plaintiff have leave to vacate his verdict, and to amend his declaration without costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Bank v. Mott
11 Abb. Pr. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Weed & Weed v. Saratoga & Schenectady Railroad
19 Wend. 533 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Wend. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-payne-nysupct-1834.