Carpenter v. Grab

257 A.D. 860, 12 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8190
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 29, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 860 (Carpenter v. Grab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Grab, 257 A.D. 860, 12 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Order directing chief of the fire department of the city of New Rochelle to renew a permit for the maintenance of a public garage and gasoline tanks on certain premises in the city of New Rochelle unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The fire chief may only deny a permit or a renewal thereof on grounds which relate to fire hazard or the like. Here it appears that every requirement affecting fire hazard has been met by the petitioner. A refusal to issue a permit upon a ground other than one which comes within the scope of the fire chief’s powers constitutes an arbitrary act and upon such a refusal the petitioner is entitled to the relief accorded. (Matter of Small v. Moss, 279 N. Y. 288; Matter of Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 id. 330, 335.) If it be the fact that the establishment exists and operates in violation of the zoning regulations, that violation may be terminated by appropriate action taken by the official directed to enforce the zoning regulations. (City of New Rochelle v. Beckwith, 268 N. Y. 315; Zoning Ordinance of the City of New Rochelle, art. XII, § 7; Matter of Kalen v. Amato, 248 App. Div. 777; Matter of Collins v. Moore, 125 Mise. 777.) On such an occasion the present petitioner will be afforded an opportunity to meet such an issue directly. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Houston v. Tri-Lakes Ltd.
681 So. 2d 104 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1996)
Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals
580 A.2d 528 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)
Harrell v. Hamblen County Quarterly Court
526 S.W.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1975)
Vitolo v. Chave
63 Misc. 2d 971 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Civitano v. City of New York
34 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Grassi v. Caldwell
60 Misc. 2d 376 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Cranford Tp. v. Errico
228 A.2d 555 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
City Bank Farmers Trust Co v. Short
203 Misc. 979 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Carpenter v. Kreuter
258 A.D. 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 860, 12 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-grab-nyappdiv-1939.