Carpenter v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 77, 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 850, 2000 WL 1185382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carpenter v. Gober. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Vet. App. 195
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided August 22, 2000·No. No. 97-676·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On October 15, 1999, the Court, in a single-judge memorandum decision, affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision of February 24,1997. On March 13, 2000, the Court granted the appellant’s motion, filed through counsel, for a panel decision and affirmed the decision of the Board. On April 3, 2000, the appellant filed, through counsel, a motion for consideration by the full court.

Motions for a full Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions or to resolve a question of exceptional importance. In this appeal, the appellant has not shown that either basis exists to warrant a full Court decision.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for a full Court decision, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for a decision by the full Court is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter v. Gober, 14 Vet. App. 77, 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 850, 2000 WL 1185382 (Cal. 2000).

14 Vet. App. 77 (Carpenter v. Gober) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Fee Agreement of Smith
10 Vet. App. 311 (Veterans Claims, 1997)
In re Fee Agreement of Mason
13 Vet. App. 79 (Veterans Claims, 1999)
In re Fee Agreement of Carpenter
13 Vet. App. 382 (Veterans Claims, 2000)