Carpenter v. Foundation Co.

124 Misc. 765, 208 N.Y.S. 327, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1110
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 18, 1924·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Tierney, J.:

The complaint alleges that a copy of the agreement is annexed to the complaint. This limits the question of whether an agreement was made to an examination of the exhibit annexed to the complaint. There are no surrounding circumstances pleaded to aid in the interpretation. The offer of the plaintiffs’ assignor was no more than the tender of an option. The option would have to be exercised to constitute proof of a contract. The word “ accepted,” subscribed by the defendant, in view of the statement of the offer that it is a memorandum of the understanding of the writer of the outcome of conferences, “subject to your immediate acceptance,” constitutes merely an acceptance of the correctness of the statement of the terms of the option, not an agreement to exercise the option.

The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the motion, under rule 106, to dismiss the same, is granted, with ten dollars costs of the motion, with leave to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of notice of entry of the order hereon on payment of said ten dollars costs and ten dollars costs of the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter v. Foundation Co., 124 Misc. 765, 208 N.Y.S. 327, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1924).

124 Misc. 765 (Carpenter v. Foundation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halpern v. Silver
187 Misc. 1023 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1946)
Benedict v. Price
38 F.2d 309 (E.D. New York, 1929)
All American Securities Co. v. Foundation Co.
211 A.D. 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)