Carpenter v. Fitch

197 P.2d 174, 87 Cal. App. 2d 534, 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1357
California Court of Appeal·Decided September 13, 1948·No. Civ. No. 16166·Published

Opinion

WOOD, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.

No judgment was made or entered in the above entitled action, and of course there was no judgment from which an appeal could be taken. The trial court made an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend. Such an order is not appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Braren v. Reliable Carpet Wks., Inc., 125 Cal.App. 489, 491 [13 P.2d 972]; Ross v. O’Brien, 1 Cal. App.2d 496, 498 [36 P.2d 1108]; Pulvermacher v. Los Angeles Co-Ordinating Com., 61 Cal.App.2d 704, 711 [143 P.2d 974].) The method of reviewing such a ruling on demurrer is by way of appeal from the judgment thereafter entered in the action. (Braren v. Reliable Carpet Wks., Inc., supra, p. 491.)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Vallée, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter v. Fitch, 197 P.2d 174, 87 Cal. App. 2d 534, 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1357 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948).

197 P.2d 174 (Carpenter v. Fitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. O'BRIEN
36 P.2d 1108 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.
13 P.2d 972 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)