Carpenter v. First National Bank of Wadesboro
191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 740, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 206
This text of 191 S.E. 329 (Carpenter v. First National Bank of Wadesboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carpenter v. First National Bank of Wadesboro, 191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 740, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 206 (N.C. 1937).
Opinion
Plaintiff’s chief complaint is to tbe exclusion of certain evidence, without which it is practically conceded no case has been made out. A careful perusal of tbe record fails to disclose any error in tbe exclusion of evidence or in tbe judgment of nonsuit. Nor has error been made to appear on tbe motion to recuse.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 740, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-first-national-bank-of-wadesboro-nc-1937.