Carpenter v. Ehrat

Ohio Court of Appeals

Carpenter v. Ehrat

16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided November 10, 1933·Published

Opinion

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

An examination of the will shows that no trust is involved, nor is the executrix to perform any duties which would not be performed by an executrix.

This court, therefore has no jurisdiction to consider the case on appeal, under the powers conferred in Article IV, §6 of the Ohio Constitution. Crowley, Admr. v Crowley et, 124 Oh St, 454. McDiarmid, Trustee v McGrew et, 43 Oh Ap 449, (Ohio Bar Report, January 16, 1933), (12 Abs 190). The appeal is dismissed.

HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

An examination of the will shows that no trust is involved, nor is the executrix to perform any duties which would not be performed by an executrix.

This court, therefore has no jurisdiction to consider the case on appeal, under the powers conferred in Article IV, §6 of the Ohio Constitution. Crowley, Admr. v Crowley et, 124 Oh St, 454. McDiarmid, Trustee v McGrew et, 43 Oh Ap 449, (Ohio Bar Report, January 16, 1933), (12 Abs 190). The appeal is dismissed.

HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.

Carpenter v. Ehrat, 16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240 (Carpenter v. Ehrat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related