Carpenter v. Ehrat

16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 10, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240 (Carpenter v. Ehrat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Ehrat, 16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

An examination of the will shows that no trust is involved, nor is the executrix to perform any duties which would not be performed by an executrix.

This court, therefore has no jurisdiction to consider the case on appeal, under the powers conferred in Article IV, §6 of the Ohio Constitution. Crowley, Admr. v Crowley et, 124 Oh St, 454. McDiarmid, Trustee v McGrew et, 43 Oh Ap 449, (Ohio Bar Report, January 16, 1933), (12 Abs 190). The appeal is dismissed.

HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDiarmid, Trustee v. McGrew
183 N.E. 92 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ohio Law. Abs. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-ehrat-ohioctapp-1933.