Carpenter v. Edwards

64 Miss. 595
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 Miss. 595 (Carpenter v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Edwards, 64 Miss. 595 (Mich. 1887).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A denial upon information is a denial “ otherwise than by the general traverse,” and is sufficient to prevent facts averred in the bill from being taken at the hearing as admitted. It is true, as held in Toulme v. Clark, ante, p. 471, that an answer upon in[597]*597formation does not put the complainant to the proof of his bill by more than one witness, but the sufficiency of an answer to require some evidence to maintain the bill is a different question. The answer in this case is sufficient to require proof to maintain the bill, and, as none was furnished, the decree was properly for the defendants.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weston v. Estate of Lawler
406 So. 2d 31 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1981)
Fant v. Fant
162 So. 159 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
Shackelford v. Brown
72 Miss. 380 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Miss. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-edwards-miss-1887.