Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security

W.D. North Carolina

Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided April 29, 2022·No. 5:21-cv-00137·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:21-CV-137-DCK LAURA THUN CARPENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) )

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Consent Motion For Reversal And Remand Pursuant To Sentence Four Of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)” (Document No. 12) filed April 27, 2022. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. Based on the parties’ agreement and applicable authority, the Court will direct that the Commissioner’s decision be reversed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” Defendant here has moved for reversal of the decision below and for a remand of this case for further administrative proceedings. (Document No. 12). For the reasons stated in the Defendant’s motion, the Court finds that remand is appropriate. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Consent Motion For Reversal And Remand Pursuant To Sentence Four Of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)” (Document No. 12) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs “Motion For Summary Judgment” (Document No. 10) be DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter a separate Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that this matter be CLOSED. SO ORDERED. Signed: April 28, 2022 DCm David C. Keesler ey United States Magistrate Judge af

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:21-CV-137-DCK LAURA THUN CARPENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) )

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Consent Motion For Reversal And Remand Pursuant To Sentence Four Of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)” (Document No. 12) filed April 27, 2022. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. Based on the parties’ agreement and applicable authority, the Court will direct that the Commissioner’s decision be reversed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” Defendant here has moved for reversal of the decision below and for a remand of this case for further administrative proceedings. (Document No. 12). For the reasons stated in the Defendant’s motion, the Court finds that remand is appropriate. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Consent Motion For Reversal And Remand Pursuant To Sentence Four Of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)” (Document No. 12) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs “Motion For Summary Judgment” (Document No. 10) be DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter a separate Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that this matter be CLOSED. SO ORDERED. Signed: April 28, 2022 DCm David C. Keesler ey United States Magistrate Judge af

Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D.N.C. 2022).

Pincite

Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security (Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related