Carpenter v. Alonso
This text of 587 So. 2d 572 (Carpenter v. Alonso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William CARPENTER and Jean Carpenter, Appellants,
v.
Manuel ALONSO, M.D., and Radiology Associates of South Miami, P.A., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*573 Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Hoppe, Backmeyer & Stokes, Miami, for appellants.
Stephens, Lynn, Lein & McNicholas, and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the trial court limiting expert witnesses in a medical malpractice case to one expert per side. Smith v. Coastal Emergency Services, Inc., 538 So.2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Crawford v. Shivashankar, 474 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Further, permitting the defendant doctor to testify as to his care of the plaintiff would not be a violation of this expert witness' limitation.
Final judgment under review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 So. 2d 572, 1991 WL 200149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-alonso-fladistctapp-1991.