Carpenter v. Alonso
Opinion
William CARPENTER and Jean Carpenter, Appellants,
v.
Manuel ALONSO, M.D., and Radiology Associates of South Miami, P.A., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*573 Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Hoppe, Backmeyer & Stokes, Miami, for appellants.
Stephens, Lynn, Lein & McNicholas, and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the trial court limiting expert witnesses in a medical malpractice case to one expert per side. Smith v. Coastal Emergency Services, Inc., 538 So.2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Crawford v. Shivashankar, 474 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Further, permitting the defendant doctor to testify as to his care of the plaintiff would not be a violation of this expert witness' limitation.
Final judgment under review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
587 So. 2d 572 (Carpenter v. Alonso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.