Carpenter Environmental Associates v. Horn

239 A.D.2d 379, 658 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5123
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 12, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover upon an account stated, the defendant appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated October 18, 1996, which appointed Robyn Lefcourt, Esq., as Referee for the purpose of supervising all remaining disclosure.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court could not appoint an attorney to act as Referee for the purpose of supervising all remaining disclosure in this action in the absence of a stipulation by the parties (see, CPLR 3104 [b]). The Supreme Court thus erred in appointing an attorney as the Referee here. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter Environmental Associates v. Horn, 239 A.D.2d 379, 658 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 379 (Carpenter Environmental Associates v. Horn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Csanko v. County of Westchester
273 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ploski v. Riverwood Owners Corp.
255 A.D.2d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)