Carothers v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Carothers v. Robison

150 S.W. 1156, 105 Tex. 426, 1912 Tex. LEXIS 172

Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 1912·No. No. 2395.·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court.

The right of the relator in this case to the writ of mandamus applied for, is based upon the unconstitutionality of Article 3498n of the Revised Statutes of 1895. The ease is disposed of by our holding in Cox. v. Robison, decided this day, to the opinion in which reference is made. The mandamus is refused.

Mandamus refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court.

The right of the relator in this case to the writ of mandamus applied for, is based upon the unconstitutionality of Article 3498n of the Revised Statutes of 1895. The ease is disposed of by our holding in Cox. v. Robison, decided this day, to the opinion in which reference is made. The mandamus is refused.

Mandamus refused.

Carothers v. Robison, 150 S.W. 1156, 105 Tex. 426, 1912 Tex. LEXIS 172 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

150 S.W. 1156 (Carothers v. Robison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.