Caronia v. Civil Service Commission of N.J.
This text of 67 A.2d 312 (Caronia v. Civil Service Commission of N.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the Civil Service Commission to grant him a hearing on his verified petition alleging that persons appointed by the City of Orange as special officers are performing services which he, as a chanceman of the police department of said city, is entitled to perform. The status of appellant as a chanceman is conceded. Caronia v.Caldwell,
The record before us is meagre and, it is alleged, does not disclose the entire situation and that the Civil Service Commission's refusal to grant appellant a hearing deprived him of his opportunity to show that his civil service rights were being violated.
The right of the municipality to appoint special officers is not challenged. The question for determination is as to *Page 371 whether the designated special officers are rendering public service that should be performed by chancemen and not by special officers.
We are of opinion that the Civil Service Commission should hear the matter and afford the parties an opportuinty to submit proof of the existing situation. To that end, the cause is remanded to the Civil Service Commission for hearing and determination on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.2d 312, 4 N.J. Super. 369, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caronia-v-civil-service-commission-of-nj-njsuperctappdiv-1949.