Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
593 A.2d 971, 220 Conn. 906, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 416
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 61, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the circumstances of this case, have the plaintiffs established their entitlement to automatic approval of their application for a wetlands permit because of the named defendant’s failure to act within the time period specified by the relevant statute and regulation?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission, 593 A.2d 971, 220 Conn. 906, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 1991).
593 A.2d 971 (Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
610 A.2d 584 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)