Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission

593 A.2d 971, 220 Conn. 906, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 416
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 25, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 61, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, have the plaintiffs established their entitlement to automatic approval of their application for a wetlands permit because of the named defendant’s failure to act within the time period specified by the relevant statute and regulation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission, 593 A.2d 971, 220 Conn. 906, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 1991).

593 A.2d 971 (Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
610 A.2d 584 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)