Caron v. Gosselin

5 R.I. Dec. 29

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 8, 1928·No. No. 73148; No. 73149·Published

Opinion

BLODGETT, J

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a new trial after verdicts of a jury for Alfred Caron, Jr., for $1500 and for Alfred Caron Sr., for $1200.

The motions are urged upon the ground that the verdicts were inadequate.

The boy was seriously injured and the damages though small are not so [30]*30inadequate as to shock the conscience of the Court.

For plaintiffs: John R. Higgins. For defendant: Ralph T. Bamefield.

Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, J

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a new trial after verdicts of a jury for Alfred Caron, Jr., for $1500 and for Alfred Caron Sr., for $1200.

The motions are urged upon the ground that the verdicts were inadequate.

The boy was seriously injured and the damages though small are not so [30]*30inadequate as to shock the conscience of the Court.

For plaintiffs: John R. Higgins. For defendant: Ralph T. Bamefield.

Motions denied.

Caron v. Gosselin, 5 R.I. Dec. 29 (R.I. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

5 R.I. Dec. 29 (Caron v. Gosselin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.