Caron v. Gosselin

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Caron v. Gosselin

5 R.I. Dec. 29

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedOctober 8, 1928

DocketNo. 73148; No. 73149

StatusPublished

This text of 5 R.I. Dec. 29 (Caron v. Gosselin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caron v. Gosselin, 5 R.I. Dec. 29 (R.I. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, J

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a new trial after verdicts of a jury for Alfred Caron, Jr., for $1500 and for Alfred Caron Sr., for $1200.

The motions are urged upon the ground that the verdicts were inadequate.

The boy was seriously injured and the damages though small are not so [30]*30inadequate as to shock the conscience of the Court.

For plaintiffs: John R. Higgins. For defendant: Ralph T. Bamefield.

Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, J

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a new trial after verdicts of a jury for Alfred Caron, Jr., for $1500 and for Alfred Caron Sr., for $1200.

The motions are urged upon the ground that the verdicts were inadequate.

The boy was seriously injured and the damages though small are not so [30]*30inadequate as to shock the conscience of the Court.

For plaintiffs: John R. Higgins. For defendant: Ralph T. Bamefield.

Motions denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 R.I. Dec. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caron-v-gosselin-risuperct-1928.