Carolyn R. Dawson v. Kevin Pakenham
This text of Carolyn R. Dawson v. Kevin Pakenham (Carolyn R. Dawson v. Kevin Pakenham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Carolyn R. Dawson v. Kevin J. Pakenham
Appellate case number: 01-19-00572-CV
Trial court case number: 19-CCV-064653
Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Fort Bend County
Appellant, Carolyn R. Dawson, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final summary judgment order signed on July 31, 2019 in a forcible detainer proceeding. And, she has filed an emergency motion for stay of execution of writ of possession pending appeal. A judgment in a forcible detainer action may not be stayed pending appeal unless the appellant files, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, a supersedeas bond in the amount set by the trial court. TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007; see Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of the City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 786 (Tex. 2006) (“[I]f a proper supersedeas bond is not filed, the judgment may be enforced, including issuance of a writ of possession evicting the tenant from the premises.”); Guillen v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 494 S.W.3d 861, 865 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.) (“If the supersedeas bond is not posted, then the writ will be executed . . . .”). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: ___August 9, 2019___
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carolyn R. Dawson v. Kevin Pakenham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolyn-r-dawson-v-kevin-pakenham-texapp-2019.