Carolyn R. Carman v. Mark Hayes and Shiela Hayes and All Other Occupants of 1021 Pebble Beach Dr., Mansfield, TX 76063

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 14, 2016
Docket02-15-00184-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Carolyn R. Carman v. Mark Hayes and Shiela Hayes and All Other Occupants of 1021 Pebble Beach Dr., Mansfield, TX 76063 (Carolyn R. Carman v. Mark Hayes and Shiela Hayes and All Other Occupants of 1021 Pebble Beach Dr., Mansfield, TX 76063) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carolyn R. Carman v. Mark Hayes and Shiela Hayes and All Other Occupants of 1021 Pebble Beach Dr., Mansfield, TX 76063, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00184-CV

CAROLYN R. CARMAN APPELLANT

V.

MARK HAYES AND SHIELA HAYES APPELLEES AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 1021 PEBBLE BEACH DR., MANSFIELD, TX 76063

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2015-001845-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On October 5, 2015, we notified appellant that her brief was due on

November 2, 2015. Appellant filed a “Motion to Substitute and for Extension of

Time” on November 19, 2015, asking to substitute counsel and to extend her

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. briefing deadline to November 30, 2015. We granted the motion and ordered her

brief due on November 30, 2015.

On December 8, 2015, we notified appellant that her brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court

within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the

need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We

have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 14, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carolyn R. Carman v. Mark Hayes and Shiela Hayes and All Other Occupants of 1021 Pebble Beach Dr., Mansfield, TX 76063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolyn-r-carman-v-mark-hayes-and-shiela-hayes-and-all-other-occupants-of-texapp-2016.