Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III
Opinion
Opinion issued October 29, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00007-CV ——————————— CAROLYN JOHNSON-THOMAS, Appellant V. EZRA THOMAS, III, Appellee
On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-00630
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Carolyn Johnson-Thomas, proceeding pro se, appealed from the
trial court’s final decree of divorce, signed on December 31, 2014. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). However, appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See id. at 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013),
§101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme
Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on
Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After
this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss, issued on April 9, 2015,
notified appellant that her appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the
filing fee, appellant failed to timely respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for nonpayment
of the required filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III (Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.