Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2015·No. 01-15-00007-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued October 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00007-CV ——————————— CAROLYN JOHNSON-THOMAS, Appellant V. EZRA THOMAS, III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-00630

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Carolyn Johnson-Thomas, proceeding pro se, appealed from the

trial court’s final decree of divorce, signed on December 31, 2014. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). However, appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See id. at 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013),

§101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After

this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss, issued on April 9, 2015,

notified appellant that her appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the

filing fee, appellant failed to timely respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for nonpayment

of the required filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III (Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.