Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 2014·No. 01-13-00118-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: G. Wesley Urquhart, Mary Elizabeth Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Carolyn Calkins James v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent- In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton

Appellate case number: 01-13-00118-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-21236

Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County

The en banc court has voted to deny Appellees’ Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Rehearing En Banc and Appellees’ Motion to Order Re-Briefing and for Oral Argument. It is ordered that these motions are denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: November 4, 2014

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle. Sharp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton (Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.