Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION
Appellate case name: G. Wesley Urquhart, Mary Elizabeth Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Carolyn Calkins James v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent- In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton
Appellate case number: 01-13-00118-CV
Trial court case number: 2011-21236
Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County
The en banc court has voted to deny Appellees’ Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Rehearing En Banc and Appellees’ Motion to Order Re-Briefing and for Oral Argument. It is ordered that these motions are denied.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle Acting for the En Banc Court*
Date: November 4, 2014
*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle. Sharp, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton (Carolyn Calkins James, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, as Agent- In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.