Carolyn C. James v. Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carolyn C. James v. Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3806
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 2012·No. 14-11-00053-CV·Published

Opinion

May 15, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals CAROLYN C. JAMES, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00053-CV V.

MICHAEL EASTON AND PETER J. RIGA, Appellees

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga, signed December 17, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in dismissing the case on special exceptions. We therefore order that the dismissal is REVERSED and order it severed and REMANDED for proceedings in accordance with this court's opinion.

Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it AFFIRMED.

We order Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolyn C. James v. Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Carolyn C. James v. Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga (Carolyn C. James v. Michael Easton and Peter J. Riga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.