Carolyn Barnes v. Dusty Humes

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 23, 2015·No. 03-15-00719-CV·Published

Opinion

November 23, 2015

NO. 03-15-00719

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

CAROLYN BARNES, ET AL, APPELLANT

V.

RICHARD COONS and DUSTY HUMES

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CLERK'S RECORD AND COURT REPORTER'S RECORD

On Appeal From Cause No. D-l-GN-15-000877

From The 419th Judicial District Court Of Travis County, Texas

The Honorable Orlinda Naranjo Presiding

RECEIVED \ :GV2 3 2015 Carolyn Barnes, J.D., Ph.D. 419 Indian Trail \^:: ^ -v Leander, Texas 78641 (281)467-8681 Barnes.legalguidance@gmail.com IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Appellant:

Carolyn Barnes 419 Indian Trail Leander, Texas 78641 (281)467-8681 Barnes.legalguidance@gmail.com

Appellees:

DUSTY HUMES RICHARD COONS

Counsel for Appellees:

Brett B. Rowe 10101 Reunion Place, Suite 900 San Antonio, Texas 78216 bbrowe@evans-rowe.com

David M. Davis DAVIS & WRIGHT, P.C, P.O. Box 2283 Austin, Texas 78768-2283 ddavis@dwlaw.com MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE APPELLATE RECORD INCLUDING THE CLERK'S RECORD AND THE COURT REPORTER'S RECORD

There are currently 12 pending appeals from this single case, Trial

Court Cause No. D-l-GN-15-000877, but only 7 appellate case numbers

have been assigned. Three appellate case numbers ending in 00630, 00605,

and 00593 appear to be the same appeal dealing with the 8 defendants

represented by the Texas Attorney General and dismissed under a late-filed

Rule 91a motion. Two other appellate case numbers ending in 00700 and

00719 appear to be the same appeal involving Humes and Coons. There are

7 other appeals that have not been assigned a case number in the appellate

court.

It appears that the end result of the piecemeal way of summarily

disposing of all these constitutional claims, without allowing or permitting

any discovery, will eventually be 15-16 separate appeals. The trial court is

systematically, sequentially, and summarily dismissing all claims and causes

of action as each of the defendants request it, while depriving Appellants of

any ability to conduct discovery or move forward on the claims.

The undue burden on Appellants of having to respond and defend

against these sequential, systematic, and summary motions to dismiss and

summary judgment while also timely perfecting the appeals, designating the records for appeal, and filing the necessary documents with both the trial

court and appellate court at the same time is impossible to meet in a timely

fashion. This Court will see when the record is filed in this Court that

Appellants have diligently pursued their claims and were extremely vexed

and burdened in the trial court with responding to these successive, serial,

and summary proceedings. The docket sheet alone is 37 pages. The largest

complicating factor is the requirement that Appellant physically go down

and view the record at the courthouse to designate it since she is not allowed

to access the AARO system online. Good cause exists to allow Appellant an

extension of time for a period of thirty days to file the record for these

appeals and the necessary docketing statements.

Alternatively, Appellant requests that this Court allow the filing of

one master Clerk's Record and on master Court Reporter's Record that

would be used in each of these appeals.

Therefore, the Appellant requests two options for relief from the

overly burdensome task of designating separate records for appeal. Either

grant Appellant's request for an extension of time to designate the record

and to allow the Court Reporter and Clerk additional time as necessary for

them to complete their tasks for appeal; or allow the District Clerk and Court

Reporter to file the complete record and that master record would be used in all the pending appeals and subsequent appeals arising from the Trial Court

Cause No. D-l-GN-15-000877.

These appeals seek to remedy serious denials of due process and

substantive violations of the United States and Texas Constitutions, as well

as Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and Texas law that have resulted in the

continued violations of Relator's basic, inherent, fundamental, and structural

rights. Good Cause exist to grant this motion for extension of time so that

the overwhelming burden of designating so many separate records for these

15-16 appeals and the corresponding court reporter's record and allow at

least 30 days for the Clerk and Court Reporter to file these records with this

Court. Alternatively, good cause exist to allow the filing of a Master Clerk's

Record that would include all pleadings filed in the cause and permit the

designation of the transcripts from all the hearings conducted in the cause as

a Master Court Reporter's Record to be used in all 16 appeals that have

arisen or will arise out of this one single case.

RELIEF REQUESTED

Relator requests that the Court grant this Motion for Extension of

Time to file the docketing statements, designate and file the Clerk's Record,

and designate and file the Court Reporter's Record for a period of thirty

days; or alternatively grant an extension of time to allow the filing of a Master Clerk's Record and Master Court Reporter's Record to be utilized in

any and all appeals from the Trial Court No. D-l-GN-15-000877 case on

appeal from the 419th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. Appellant requests that the Court award all other relief as the Court deems

just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Carolyn Barnes 419 Indian Trail Leander, TX 78641 281 467 8681 barnes.legalguidance@gmail.com

By: Carolyn Barnes JURAT

COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON

STATE OF TEXAS

Pursuant to Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code Sec. 132.001, I, Carolyn Barnes, do hereby swear and affirm that the facts stated above are true and correct based on personal knowledge.

I aver that "My name is Carolyn Barnes, by date of birth is January 12, 1957, and my address is 419 Indian Trail, Leander, Texas 78641 in the United States of America. I swear under penalty of perjury that all the facts stated herein are within my personal knowledge and true and correct.

I have read the foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File the Appellate Record and the facts stated within that are not verified by the record are true and correct to the best of her knowledge, and the exhibits filed separately in an appendix to this petition are true and correct copies of the original documents.

SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 20th day ofNovember, 2015.

By:_ Carolyn Barnes CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Plaintiff has conferred with opposing counsel and they are not

opposed to this request for an extension of time.

Carolyn Barnes

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

By my signature above, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of

the foregoing document has been served pursuant to Rule 21a of the Texas

Rules of Civil Procedure on all counsel of record on this the 23rd day of November 2015. Carolyn Barnes 419 Indian Trail Leander, TX 78641 Barnes.legalguidance@gmai1.com (281)467-8681

November 23,2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals PO Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711 Price Daniel Sr. Building 209 West 14th Street, Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

RE: Cause No. D-l-GN-15-000877 Carolyn Barnes, et al v. Texas Attorney General, et al

Dear Sir or Madame:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolyn Barnes v. Dusty Humes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Carolyn Barnes v. Dusty Humes (Carolyn Barnes v. Dusty Humes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.