Caroline C. Almond, Administratrix of the Estate of Elinor Hynes, Deceased, a Minor v. Joseph Pollon and John Broomall

Third Circuit

Caroline C. Almond, Administratrix of the Estate of Elinor Hynes, Deceased, a Minor v. Joseph Pollon and John Broomall

300 F.2d 763, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5476

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 1962

Docket13810

StatusPublished

This text of 300 F.2d 763 (Caroline C. Almond, Administratrix of the Estate of Elinor Hynes, Deceased, a Minor v. Joseph Pollon and John Broomall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caroline C. Almond, Administratrix of the Estate of Elinor Hynes, Deceased, a Minor v. Joseph Pollon and John Broomall, 300 F.2d 763, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5476 (3d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by an administratrix to recover damages for the death of a small child who was run over by the defendant, Pollon. The other defendant, Broomall, is charged with responsibility on the theory that he did not stop or park his car in accordance with the pertinent Pennsylvania statutory provisions and that this failure contributed to the accident which resulted in the child’s death. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant Broomall; the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant Pollon. The trial judge not only charged the jury in detail but wrote a memorandum discussing the points in the case and denying the motion for a new trial. There was no error.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed, 198 F.Supp. 301.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by an administratrix to recover damages for the death of a small child who was run over by the defendant, Pollon. The other defendant, Broomall, is charged with responsibility on the theory that he did not stop or park his car in accordance with the pertinent Pennsylvania statutory provisions and that this failure contributed to the accident which resulted in the child’s death. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant Broomall; the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant Pollon. The trial judge not only charged the jury in detail but wrote a memorandum discussing the points in the case and denying the motion for a new trial. There was no error.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed, 198 F.Supp. 301.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 F.2d 763, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caroline-c-almond-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-elinor-hynes-deceased-ca3-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack