Carolina Sexton v. Rose Hayden
This text of Carolina Sexton v. Rose Hayden (Carolina Sexton v. Rose Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted in part; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 24, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00267-CV
CAROLINA SEXTON, Appellant
V.
ROSE HAYDEN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-18498
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 15, 2021. On August 11, 2021, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). That portion of appellant’s motion is granted.
Appellant further requests a return of the funds she deposited with the trial court for the preparation of the clerk’s record that were in excess of the actual cost of preparing the clerk’s record to date. The bill of costs attached the clerk’s record filed with this court on June 11, 2021 reflects that the costs of preparing the record was $191.00. Appellant states in her motion that she deposited $191.00 for the preparation of the clerk’s record. There is no excess to return. That portion of appellant’s motion is denied.
We dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carolina Sexton v. Rose Hayden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolina-sexton-v-rose-hayden-texapp-2021.