Carolina Sanchez and All Other Occupants v. A. Jimenez D/B/A Lulac Village Apt.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 21, 2024
Docket13-23-00295-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Carolina Sanchez and All Other Occupants v. A. Jimenez D/B/A Lulac Village Apt. (Carolina Sanchez and All Other Occupants v. A. Jimenez D/B/A Lulac Village Apt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carolina Sanchez and All Other Occupants v. A. Jimenez D/B/A Lulac Village Apt., (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-23-00295-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CAROLINA SANCHEZ AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants,

v.

A. JIMENEZ D/B/A LULAC VILLAGE APT., Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

On January 18, 2024, appellant Carolina Sanchez “and all other occupants” filed

a pro se notice of appeal from a judgment of eviction. On January 9, 2024, the Clerk of

this Court advised appellants by certified letter that the appellants’ brief was due on

December 15, 2023, that the brief had not been timely filed, and that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within ten days, appellants explained the failure to file the brief and the

appellee would not be significantly injured by a late filing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1),

42.3(b), (c). Because it appeared that appellants failed to receive this certified letter, on

February 16, 2024, the Clerk advised appellants by email and regular mail that the brief

had not been filed and that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within ten days,

appellants explained the failure and the appellee would not be significantly injured by their

failure to timely file a brief. See id. Appellants neither responded to the Clerk’s directives

nor filed the brief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the foregoing sequence of

events, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

id. R. 38.8(a); Nevarez v. Elguea, 181 S.W.3d 540, 541 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, no

pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 21st day of March, 2024.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nevarez v. ELGUEA
181 S.W.3d 540 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carolina Sanchez and All Other Occupants v. A. Jimenez D/B/A Lulac Village Apt., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolina-sanchez-and-all-other-occupants-v-a-jimenez-dba-lulac-village-texapp-2024.