Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Charles N. Walker Roofing Co.

135 S.E. 503, 163 Ga. 33, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 13
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1926·No. No. 5376·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error in the Supreme Court is without merit. Powell v. State, 152 Ga. 81 (108 S. E. 464) ; Moore v. Adams, 153 Ga. 709, 712 (113 S. E. 383, 23 A. L. R. 925).

2. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers, nor in granting the temporary injunction. While there are separate exceptions to the overruling of the demurrers and to the grant of the injunction, the grant of the injunction necessarily implies that the trial judge' considered the petition as being good as against a general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. William G. Grant, for plaintiffs in error. T. B. Higdon, W. 0. Slate, and W. M. Everett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Charles N. Walker Roofing Co., 135 S.E. 503, 163 Ga. 33, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 13 (Ga. 1926).

135 S.E. 503 (Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Charles N. Walker Roofing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinney v. Crow
199 S.E. 198 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Barron v. Barron
182 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Bridges v. Georgia Power Co.
147 S.E. 589 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Ward v. Parks
142 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)