Carolina National Bank v. Spigner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Carolina National Bank v. Spigner

90 S.E. 748, 106 S.C. 185, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 285

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 14, 1916

Docket9546

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 748 (Carolina National Bank v. Spigner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carolina National Bank v. Spigner, 90 S.E. 748, 106 S.C. 185, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 285 (S.C. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

The Circuit Judges having been called to the assistance of the Supreme Court,

*192 October 14, 1916.

The opinion of the Court en banc was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

For the reasons stated by his Honor,, the Circuit Judge, and upon the authority of Bank v. Neil, 106 S. C. 173, 90 S. E. 744, in which the opinion has just been filed, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick, Gage and Fraser, and Circuit Judges Prince, Memminger, Bowman, Shipp, SeasE, Gary, Wilson, Smith and Peurifoy, concur in the opinion of the Court. Mr. Justice Watts was disqualified and did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI