Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Commonwealth Bond & Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Commonwealth Bond & Mortgage Co.

200 S.E. 385, 214 N.C. 698, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 418

DecidedJanuary 4, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 200 S.E. 385 (Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Commonwealth Bond & Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Commonwealth Bond & Mortgage Co., 200 S.E. 385, 214 N.C. 698, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

An examination of the record discloses that appellant testified in the original cause that he had authorized the collection of the rent by the defendant corporation for application upon a debt due that corporation." The appellant claims that there were certain conditions involved in this agreement, non-compliance with which left appellant free to prosecute his present claim.

The discretion exercised by the presiding judge in refusing the motion of appellant to be allowed to intervene, after, judgment had been rendered in the cause, is fully justified by the record, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

An examination of the record discloses that appellant testified in the original cause that he had authorized the collection of the rent by the defendant corporation for application upon a debt due that corporation." The appellant claims that there were certain conditions involved in this agreement, non-compliance with which left appellant free to prosecute his present claim.

The discretion exercised by the presiding judge in refusing the motion of appellant to be allowed to intervene, after, judgment had been rendered in the cause, is fully justified by the record, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.E. 385, 214 N.C. 698, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolina-mortgage-co-v-commonwealth-bond-mortgage-co-nc-1939.