Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh

Fourth Circuit

Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh

474 F. App'x 163

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2012·No. No. 11-2399·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles and Camilla Stambaugh appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. [164] Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh, No. 1:10-cv-00174-MR-DLH, 2011 WL 6217409 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles and Camilla Stambaugh appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. [164] Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh, No. 1:10-cv-00174-MR-DLH, 2011 WL 6217409 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh, 474 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 163 (Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.