Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh
This text of 474 F. App'x 163 (Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles and Camilla Stambaugh appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. [164]*164Carolina First Bank v. Stambaugh, No. 1:10-cv-00174-MR-DLH, 2011 WL 6217409 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolina-first-bank-v-stambaugh-ca4-2012.