Carolina Drive-Ur-Self, Inc. v. Maiden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Carolina Drive-Ur-Self, Inc. v. Maiden

83 S.E.2d 501, 240 N.C. 629, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 480

DecidedSeptember 22, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.E.2d 501 (Carolina Drive-Ur-Self, Inc. v. Maiden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carolina Drive-Ur-Self, Inc. v. Maiden, 83 S.E.2d 501, 240 N.C. 629, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 480 (N.C. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Ctfeiam.

Due and careful consideration has been given to each assignment of error presented by tbe appellant on this appeal, and we find no error in tbe trial below of sufficient merit to warrant a disturbance of tbe judgment entered in tbe Superior Court. Tbe facts are simple. Tbe applicable rules of law well established. There is no need for [630]*630further discussion. All the defendant’s assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ctfeiam.

Due and careful consideration has been given to each assignment of error presented by tbe appellant on this appeal, and we find no error in tbe trial below of sufficient merit to warrant a disturbance of tbe judgment entered in tbe Superior Court. Tbe facts are simple. Tbe applicable rules of law well established. There is no need for [630]*630further discussion. All the defendant’s assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 S.E.2d 501, 240 N.C. 629, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolina-drive-ur-self-inc-v-maiden-nc-1954.