Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland

388 S.E.2d 815, 300 S.C. 492, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 5, 1990·No. 23153·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Petitioner seeks certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland, 299 S. C. 237, 384 S. E. (2d) 72 (Ct. App. 1989). Finding procedural errors, we grant certiorari, dispense with further briefing, reverse and remand with instructions.

The decision below rested on alternate grounds. Although there was no challenge by way of exception or argument in brief, the Court of Appeals reversed the master’s finding that respondent withdrew the property from sale during the listing period. This was clearly error. See Connolly v. People's Life Ins. Co., 299 S.C. 348, 384 S. E. (2d) 738 (1989). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals’ decision is reversed and the appeal remanded to that court with instructions to address only those issues which are properly before it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland, 388 S.E.2d 815, 300 S.C. 492, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 28 (S.C. 1990).

388 S.E.2d 815 (Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MARO v. Lewis
697 S.E.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2010)
State v. Austin
409 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1991)
Bellamy v. Payne
403 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1991)
Dibble v. Thomas
391 S.E.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1990)