Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland

388 S.E.2d 815, 300 S.C. 492, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 28

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1990

Docket23153

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 388 S.E.2d 815 (Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland, 388 S.E.2d 815, 300 S.C. 492, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 28 (S.C. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Petitioner seeks certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland, 299 S. C. 237, 384 S. E. (2d) 72 (Ct. App. 1989). Finding procedural errors, we grant certiorari, dispense with further briefing, reverse and remand with instructions.

The decision below rested on alternate grounds. Although there was no challenge by way of exception or argument in brief, the Court of Appeals reversed the master’s finding that respondent withdrew the property from sale during the listing period. This was clearly error. See Connolly v. People's Life Ins. Co., 299 S.C. 348, 384 S. E. (2d) 738 (1989). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals’ decision is reversed and the appeal remanded to that court with instructions to address only those issues which are properly before it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Petitioner seeks certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland, 299 S. C. 237, 384 S. E. (2d) 72 (Ct. App. 1989). Finding procedural errors, we grant certiorari, dispense with further briefing, reverse and remand with instructions.

The decision below rested on alternate grounds. Although there was no challenge by way of exception or argument in brief, the Court of Appeals reversed the master’s finding that respondent withdrew the property from sale during the listing period. This was clearly error. See Connolly v. People's Life Ins. Co., 299 S.C. 348, 384 S. E. (2d) 738 (1989). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals’ decision is reversed and the appeal remanded to that court with instructions to address only those issues which are properly before it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

388 S.E.2d 815, 300 S.C. 492, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carolina-business-brokers-v-strickland-sc-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack