Carole Daniel and Stan Daniel v. Cheryl Kay Webb, in Her Capacity as Successor Independent of the Estate of Melvin Bray, and Cheryl Kay Webb in Her Capacity as Indendent of the Estate of Gladys Bray, and Mid-Century Ins. Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Carole Daniel and Stan Daniel v. Cheryl Kay Webb, in Her Capacity as Successor Independent of the Estate of Melvin Bray, and Cheryl Kay Webb in Her Capacity as Indendent of the Estate of Gladys Bray, and Mid-Century Ins. Co. of Texas

DecidedSeptember 18, 2003

Docket07-03-00245-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Carole Daniel and Stan Daniel v. Cheryl Kay Webb, in Her Capacity as Successor Independent of the Estate of Melvin Bray, and Cheryl Kay Webb in Her Capacity as Indendent of the Estate of Gladys Bray, and Mid-Century Ins. Co. of Texas (Carole Daniel and Stan Daniel v. Cheryl Kay Webb, in Her Capacity as Successor Independent of the Estate of Melvin Bray, and Cheryl Kay Webb in Her Capacity as Indendent of the Estate of Gladys Bray, and Mid-Century Ins. Co. of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carole Daniel and Stan Daniel v. Cheryl Kay Webb, in Her Capacity as Successor Independent of the Estate of Melvin Bray, and Cheryl Kay Webb in Her Capacity as Indendent of the Estate of Gladys Bray, and Mid-Century Ins. Co. of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0245-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

SEPTEMBER 18, 2003

______________________________

CAROLE DANIEL AND STAN DANIEL, APPELLANTS

V.

CHERYL OF THEKAY ESTATE W EBB, OFINMELVIN HER CAPACITY BRAY, DECEASED AS SUCCESSOR AND CHERYL INDEPENDENT KAY W EBB EXECUTOR IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF GLADYS BRAY, DECEASED AND MID-CENTURY INS. CO. OF TEXAS, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2001-513,596; HONORABLE J. BLAIR CHERRY, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellants’ motion to dismiss by which they indicate they

no longer wish to pursue this appeal. W ithout passing on the merits of the case, their motion

is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Don H. Reavis Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI