Carole Ann Realties, Inc. v. Starr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carole Ann Realties, Inc. v. Starr

50 A.D.2d 851, 376 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 851 (Carole Ann Realties, Inc. v. Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carole Ann Realties, Inc. v. Starr, 50 A.D.2d 851, 376 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 6, 1975, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and declared that the service fee charged by the city rent agency to process 1974-1975 maximum base rent-maximum collectible rent (MBR-MCR) increase orders is a valid exercise of its power. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. We find no merit to plaintiff’s claim that the city rent agency exceeded its authority in imposing a service charge to enable it to administer the MBR-MCR program of rent increases (Administrative Code of City of New York, §§ Y51-5.0, subd a, par [4]; Y51-5.0, subd g, par [1]). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 6, 1975, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and declared that the service fee charged by the city rent agency to process 1974-1975 maximum base rent-maximum collectible rent (MBR-MCR) increase orders is a valid exercise of its power. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. We find no merit to plaintiff’s claim that the city rent agency exceeded its authority in imposing a service charge to enable it to administer the MBR-MCR program of rent increases (Administrative Code of City of New York, §§ Y51-5.0, subd a, par [4]; Y51-5.0, subd g, par [1]). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 851, 376 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carole-ann-realties-inc-v-starr-nyappdiv-1975.