Carolan v. Fieber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carolan v. Fieber

6 A.D.2d 1050, 180 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4566

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 1958·Published

Opinion

In an action for determination of a claim to real property (Real Property Law, art. 15), to cancel deeds, for an accounting, and for other relief, the appeal is (1) from an order granting the motion of respondent Fieber to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the action is barred by a two-year Statute of Limitations (Administrative Code of City of New York, § D17-12.0, subd. e) and directing the discharge of the notice of pendency of action, and (2) from the judgment entered on said order. [1051]*1051Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [6 Misc 2d 229.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for determination of a claim to real property (Real Property Law, art. 15), to cancel deeds, for an accounting, and for other relief, the appeal is (1) from an order granting the motion of respondent Fieber to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the action is barred by a two-year Statute of Limitations (Administrative Code of City of New York, § D17-12.0, subd. e) and directing the discharge of the notice of pendency of action, and (2) from the judgment entered on said order. [1051]*1051Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [6 Misc 2d 229.]

Carolan v. Fieber, 6 A.D.2d 1050, 180 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

6 A.D.2d 1050 (Carolan v. Fieber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related