Carol Wilkerson v. Grinnell Corporation

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: October 24, 2024
• Docket: 24-12606
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-12606 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 10/24/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12606 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

CAROL WILKERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GRINNELL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:99-cv-00133-RSB-CLR ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12606 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 10/24/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12606

Before WILSON, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Carol Wilkerson appeals from the district court’s order deny- ing her motion to rescind its previous order imposing filing re- strictions on her. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because Wilkerson’s notice of appeal is untimely. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010). The deadline for filing a no- tice of appeal was July 8, 2024, and Wilkerson did not file her notice of appeal until August 9, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Moreover, there is no basis in the record for relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A), 4(a)(6); Sanders v. United States, 113 F.3d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1997). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.