Carol Joyce Turk v. James William Turk

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 3, 2002
Docket13-02-00459-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Carol Joyce Turk v. James William Turk (Carol Joyce Turk v. James William Turk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carol Joyce Turk v. James William Turk, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-02-459-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI



CAROL JOYCE TURK, Appellant,

v.



JAMES WILLIAM TURK, Appellee.



On appeal from the 25th District Court

of Gonzales County, Texas.



O P I N I O N


Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, CAROL JOYCE TURK, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas, in cause number 20,569. No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On August 28, 2002, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM



Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.



Opinion delivered and filed

this the 3rd day of October, 2002.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carol Joyce Turk v. James William Turk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carol-joyce-turk-v-james-william-turk-texapp-2002.