Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Dade County

152 So. 2d 462, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3201
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 24, 1963·No. No. 32081·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued a writ of certiorari on the basis of a petition therefor which made a prima facie showing of jurisdiction. After consideration of briefs and oral arguments, we have concluded that the writ was improvidently issued. We have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal, 143 So.2d 828, and the prior decision of this Court in City of Miami Beach v. Perell, Fla., 52 So.2d 906. See also Frix v. Beck, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 81; Bloomfield v. Mayo, Fla.App., 119 So.2d 417; Teston v. City of Tampa, Fla., 143 So.2d 473. Accordingly the writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Dade County, 152 So. 2d 462, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3201 (Fla. 1963).

152 So. 2d 462 (Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bloomfield v. Mayo
119 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Frix v. Beck
104 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Dade County
143 So. 2d 828 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Teston v. City of Tampa
143 So. 2d 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
City of Miami Beach v. Perell
52 So. 2d 906 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)