Carol Ann Davis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 18, 2000
Docket03-99-00613-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Carol Ann Davis v. State (Carol Ann Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carol Ann Davis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-99-00613-CR

NO. 03-99-00614-CR

Carol Ann Davis, Appellant


v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NOS. 483411 & 483416, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

In each cause, a jury found appellant Carol Ann Davis guilty of knowingly employing an unlicensed person as a private investigator. See Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 790, § 15, 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 4085, 4095 (Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 4413(29bb), § 44(f), since repealed and codified at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1702.386 (West 2000)). The court assessed punishment in each cause at incarceration for one year and a $4000 fine, but suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision. Because we find unassigned error that renders these convictions void, we will reverse and render judgments of acquittal.

Section 44(f) of former article 4413(29bb) was adopted by the Seventy-fourth Legislature effective September 1, 1995, and applied only to offenses committed on or after that date. See id., ch. 790, §§ 18, 19, 1995 Tex Gen. Laws at 4096. The conduct alleged and proved by the State in these causes was committed in July and August 1995. In response to an inquiry from this Court, the State concedes error. Because appellant was convicted for violating a statute that was not in effect at the time she acted, the convictions are void.

We reverse the judgments of conviction and render judgments of acquittal.



J. Woodfin Jones, Justice

Before Justices Jones, Yeakel and Patterson

Reversed and Rendered on Both Causes

Filed: May 18, 2000

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1702.386
Texas OC § 1702.386

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carol Ann Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carol-ann-davis-v-state-texapp-2000.