Carogano v. Carogano
This text of 232 A.D. 660 (Carogano v. Carogano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. If the facts now set forth in the affidavit of the defendant are true he may renew his motion upon proper papers at which time the court at Special Term may examine witnesses or send the 'matter to an official referee for investigation. Present—-Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carogano-v-carogano-nyappdiv-1931.