Caro v. Marsh USA, Inc.
This text of 997 N.E.2d 139 (Caro v. Marsh USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from so much of the Supreme Court order as directed that the video recording of all future depositions be at appellant’s attorney’s expense, dismissed upon the ground that as to that part of the Appellate Division order, appellant is not a party aggrieved; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
997 N.E.2d 139, 21 N.Y.3d 1068, 2013 NY Slip Op 85349, 974 N.Y.S.2d 314, 2013 WL 5180049, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caro-v-marsh-usa-inc-ny-2013.