Carnoskes v. Aetna Industries, Inc.
731 N.W.2d 772, 478 Mich. 889
This text of 731 N.W.2d 772 (Carnoskes v. Aetna Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carnoskes v. Aetna Industries, Inc., 731 N.W.2d 772, 478 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Ronald J. CARNOSKES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AETNA INDUSTRIES, INC., a/k/a AZ Automotive, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 N.W.2d 772, 478 Mich. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnoskes-v-aetna-industries-inc-mich-2007.