CARNIVAL LEISURE INDUS. LTD. v. Herman
This text of 629 So. 2d 882 (CARNIVAL LEISURE INDUS. LTD. v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CARNIVAL LEISURE INDUSTRIES, LTD., Appellant,
v.
Jay HERMAN, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
James E. Tribble and Angela C. Flowers, Blackwell & Walker, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Hal Vogel, Aventura and Barry I. Finkel, Frankel and Finkel, P.A., Pompano Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the authority of Barquin v. Flores, 459 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Dorado Beach Hotel Corp. v. Jernigan, 202 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), appeal dismissed, 209 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1968); Young v. Sands Inc., 122 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
Foreign casino gambling obligations, although valid where created, are unenforceable in Florida. We interpret Florida Statute Section 849.26 as exempting transactions expressly authorized by Florida law, not by foreign law.
DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 So. 2d 882, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11437, 1993 WL 458979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnival-leisure-indus-ltd-v-herman-fladistctapp-1993.