Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez

444 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1984·No. No. 83-1077·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting each of the defendant’s contentions on this appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a non-jury trial in a personal injury action, we hold that (a) the determination of liability is supported by the evidence, Majeske v. Palm Beach Ken[538] nel Club, 117 So.2d 531 (Fla.2d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960); Millar v. Tropical Gables Corp., 99 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); 9 Fla.Jur.2d Carriers §§ 111, 126 (1979); (b) the damage award is not beyond the province of the trier of fact, Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1977); and (c) no harmful error has been demonstrated in the admission or striking of various items of evidence. Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); Prince v. Aucilla Naval Stores Co., 103 Fla. 605, 137 So. 886 (1931); Landin v. Oerting, 61 Fla. 652, 55 So. 843 (1911); Leeb v. Read, 190 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Sec. 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez, 444 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 537 (Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bould v. Touchette
349 So. 2d 1181 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Binger v. King Pest Control
401 So. 2d 1310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Leeb v. Read
190 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Majeske v. Palm Beach Kennel Club
117 So. 2d 531 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Millar v. Tropical Gables Corp.
99 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Prince v. Aucilla River Naval Stores Co.
137 So. 886 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Landin v. Oerting
61 Fla. 652 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)