Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez

444 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1077

StatusPublished

This text of 444 So. 2d 537 (Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Alvarez, 444 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting each of the defendant’s contentions on this appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a non-jury trial in a personal injury action, we hold that (a) the determination of liability is supported by the evidence, Majeske v. Palm Beach Ken[538]*538nel Club, 117 So.2d 531 (Fla.2d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960); Millar v. Tropical Gables Corp., 99 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); 9 Fla.Jur.2d Carriers §§ 111, 126 (1979); (b) the damage award is not beyond the province of the trier of fact, Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1977); and (c) no harmful error has been demonstrated in the admission or striking of various items of evidence. Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); Prince v. Aucilla Naval Stores Co., 103 Fla. 605, 137 So. 886 (1931); Landin v. Oerting, 61 Fla. 652, 55 So. 843 (1911); Leeb v. Read, 190 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Sec. 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting each of the defendant’s contentions on this appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a non-jury trial in a personal injury action, we hold that (a) the determination of liability is supported by the evidence, Majeske v. Palm Beach Ken[538]*538nel Club, 117 So.2d 531 (Fla.2d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960); Millar v. Tropical Gables Corp., 99 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); 9 Fla.Jur.2d Carriers §§ 111, 126 (1979); (b) the damage award is not beyond the province of the trier of fact, Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1977); and (c) no harmful error has been demonstrated in the admission or striking of various items of evidence. Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); Prince v. Aucilla Naval Stores Co., 103 Fla. 605, 137 So. 886 (1931); Landin v. Oerting, 61 Fla. 652, 55 So. 843 (1911); Leeb v. Read, 190 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Sec. 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnival-cruise-lines-inc-v-alvarez-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack