Carnival Corp. v. Carr

859 So. 2d 1255, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17611, 2003 WL 22715804
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-514
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 859 So. 2d 1255 (Carnival Corp. v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carnival Corp. v. Carr, 859 So. 2d 1255, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17611, 2003 WL 22715804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find, on the record before us, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds. See Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996). See also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(a); Ira Mex, Inc. v. Southeastern Interior Constr., Inc., 777 So.2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(finding that decision to grant or deny motion to dismiss from inconvenient forum rests in discretion of trial court, subject to review for abuse of discretion).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Earnest v. Amoco Oil Co.
859 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 So. 2d 1255, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17611, 2003 WL 22715804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carnival-corp-v-carr-fladistctapp-2003.