Carnival Corp. v. Carr
859 So. 2d 1255, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17611, 2003 WL 22715804
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2003·No. No. 3D03-514·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find, on the record before us, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds. See Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996). See also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(a); Ira Mex, Inc. v. Southeastern Interior Constr., Inc., 777 So.2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(finding that decision to grant or deny motion to dismiss from inconvenient forum rests in discretion of trial court, subject to review for abuse of discretion).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carnival Corp. v. Carr, 859 So. 2d 1255, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17611, 2003 WL 22715804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
859 So. 2d 1255 (Carnival Corp. v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Earnest v. Amoco Oil Co.
859 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)