Carney v. Hamilton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Carney v. Hamilton

42 So. 378, 89 Miss. 747

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 So. 378 (Carney v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carney v. Hamilton, 42 So. 378, 89 Miss. 747 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was before me when I was presiding as chancellor, and was decided by me and appealed to this court. I am now satisfied that the case was decided wrong in the court below. [754]*754On the facts as presented we do not think that Carney was maintaining a depot for the distribution or shipment of coca-cola within the meaning of Laws 1904, ch. 76, sec. 18, p. 62. The coca-cola was bought and sold by him as any other article of merchandise in conducting his business of wholesale grocer.

Reversed and case dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was before me when I was presiding as chancellor, and was decided by me and appealed to this court. I am now satisfied that the case was decided wrong in the court below. [754]*754On the facts as presented we do not think that Carney was maintaining a depot for the distribution or shipment of coca-cola within the meaning of Laws 1904, ch. 76, sec. 18, p. 62. The coca-cola was bought and sold by him as any other article of merchandise in conducting his business of wholesale grocer.

Reversed and case dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 So. 378, 89 Miss. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carney-v-hamilton-miss-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack