Carney v. Dir. of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carney v. Dir. of Revenue

555 S.W.3d 492

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 11, 2018

DocketWD 81050

StatusPublished

This text of 555 S.W.3d 492 (Carney v. Dir. of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carney v. Dir. of Revenue, 555 S.W.3d 492 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*493David Carney appeals from the trial court's judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's suspension of his driving privileges. He contends that the Director failed to establish that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated. Specifically, Mr. Carney claims that the officer improperly relied on the arrest video and utilized information therein post-arrest to justify his decision to arrest him for driving while intoxicated. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*493David Carney appeals from the trial court's judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's suspension of his driving privileges. He contends that the Director failed to establish that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated. Specifically, Mr. Carney claims that the officer improperly relied on the arrest video and utilized information therein post-arrest to justify his decision to arrest him for driving while intoxicated. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 S.W.3d 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carney-v-dir-of-revenue-moctapp-2018.