Carney v. City of New Haven
This text of 9 Conn. Super. Ct. 79 (Carney v. City of New Haven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff has submitted to the clerk an amendment to her complaint in an effort to meet a defect pointed out in a memorandum by Quinlan, J., sustaining a previous demurrer by this defendant. This amendment comes long after the time provided for filing such pleading in the Rules of Practice (Practice Book [1934] § 86).
The amendment sets up no cause of action not included in the complaint to which a demurrer has been sustained. It repeats, in substance, allegations of the complaint. The defect pointed out in the memorandum referred to still is present, and in so far as the plaintiff may now attempt to rely on section 1420 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1930, no notice provided for therein is alleged to have been given.
The demurrer is sustained upon all of its grounds.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Conn. Super. Ct. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carney-v-city-of-new-haven-connsuperct-1941.