Carney v. City of Cleveland
This text of 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (Carney v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the entire record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful. Prom an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the board is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carney-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1957.