Carney v. City of Cleveland

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 6, 1957
DocketNo. 35134
StatusPublished

This text of 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (Carney v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carney v. City of Cleveland, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (Ohio 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the entire record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful. Prom an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the board is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carney-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1957.