Carney v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Carney v. City of Cleveland

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 1957·No. No. 35134·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the entire record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful. Prom an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the board is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the entire record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful. Prom an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the board is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Carney v. City of Cleveland, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (Ohio 1957).

Pincite

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (Carney v. City of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.