Carney v. Bares

265 A.D. 544, 39 N.Y.S.2d 865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carney v. Bares. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 A.D. 175

Opinions

Order, so far as appealed from, reversed with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendants appearing by separate counsel and filing briefs herein; the motion to strike out the first defense of the defendants Bares et al. denied, the motion to strike out the first and third defenses of the defendant Vaillant-Dauvergne, Inc., denied, and the cross-motion of defendant Vaillant-Dauvergne, Inc., for examination before trial of the plaintiff Lucille J. Carney granted. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Martin, P. J., Townley and Glennon, «£«!., concur • Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to affirm in opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carney v. Bares, 265 A.D. 544, 39 N.Y.S.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

265 A.D. 544 (Carney v. Bares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cocoa Trading Corp. v. Bayway Terminal Corp.
265 A.D. 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)